在我国的民法理论和司法实践中,对于违约给予非财产损害赔偿与否,即受害人能否基于对方违约主张精神损害赔偿的诉求,司法实践上众说纷纭,但持否定立场的观点占据主流地位。笔者认为从法理上讲,法律给予受害人非财产损害赔偿救济与否的客观依据应以损害事实是否存在为基准,而不应以是基于侵权还是违约的请求权进行衡量。随着社会的发展、“商业化理论”的发展,特别是对“人格商品化理论”的逐步肯定,违约受害人亦应有主张非财产损害赔偿的权利。 In China’s civil law theory and judicial practice, the non-property damage compensation for breach of contract or not, that is, the victim can compensate for the spirit of compensation claims based on the other party’s claim for breach of contract, judicial practice, different opinions, but hold the position of negative view prevails. According to the author’s theory, the objective basis of legal remedy for the non-property damage compensation given by the law should be based on whether the damage exists or not, rather than on the basis of the right of claim based on infringement or non-compliance. With the development of society, the development of “commercialization theory”, especially the gradual affirmation of “the theory of personality commercialization”, the victims of breach of contract should also have the right to claim non-property damages.