甲骨文■、■、■、■早已为古文字学家所破译,■即“宫”字,■却“墉”字,■即“囱”字,■即“井”字,无容置疑。然而这几个古文字的形象和原始涵义,至今仍然没有圆满可信的解释。这主要是因为这种图形文字造字这初所依据的实物早已失去了它当时的意义或不复存在,即使后代的小学大家也无法确知其所本,仅凭后世见闻予以臆测,自然不能符合实际。■、■、■、■都是建筑方面的字,若确知其图形的来历以及最初的涵义,必须了解文字 Oracle ■, ■, ■, ■ have long been broken by the ancient texts, ■ that is, the word “palace”, but the word “墉”, that is, Word, no doubt. However, there are still no satisfactory and credible explanations of the characters and original meanings of these ancient Chinese characters. This is mainly because the original material upon which this graphic writing was originally based has lost its original meaning or ceased to exist. Even if all the elementary students in our descendants can not know their true nature, Realistic. ■, ■, ■, ■ are the words of the building, if you know the origin of the graphic and the original meaning, you must understand the text