教学改革是一个迟来的老话题。我们从上世纪80年代初就开始了关于基础教育的讨论。那时的问题是关于线与调子谁更接近本质,是线、还是明暗、调子,用哪个来表现形体更充分准确?什么是形准的标准?然后是结构素描,到底是分析性还是片面性的?素描到底应该是什么样子的?是全因素还是单因素,素描的本质又是什么?再以后便是油画材料如何正确使用,用什么油,用什么布,等等。一系列的技术性的研究,应该说在不同层次上解决了一部分艺术家在绘画创作上的疑虑,这些年也差不多都是围绕这些问题 Teaching reform is a belated old topic. We started the discussion on basic education from the early 1980s. The question then is about who is closer to the essence of the line and tone, whether it is a line, or a light and dark tone, and which one is used to represent a body more fully and accurately? What is the standard of form and criterion? Then is the structural sketch, in the final analysis or one-sidedness What should be the sketch in the end? Is all-factor or single factor, what is the nature of the sketch? And then is how to use the correct use of oil painting materials, what oil, what cloth, and so on. A series of technical studies should be said at different levels to solve some of the artists in the painting on the doubts, these years are almost all around these issues