论文部分内容阅读
纪录片要不要解说词,是一件让纪录片的创作者苦恼的选择。如果不用,你讲述的故事是否仅凭画面、采访和音乐就能进行下去,能否让观众准确无误地看懂你的故事,如果用,你的解说是否画蛇添足,你的解说是否简洁精练,常常又让人难以信心十足。我们看到在中外优秀的纪录片中,既有全无解说,仅凭画面说话的杰出作品,像《鸟的迁徙》《归途列车》这样的,也有凭着精准优美且富有逻辑的解说打动人心的作品,像《华氏911》《监守自盗》《生于妓院》这样的。可以看出,无论是解说词还是画外音,如果处理得当,都是推动故事发展的最佳和最有效的途径之一,一两句富有成
Documentary is not to explain the word, is a documentary creator distressed choice. If you do not, you tell the story of whether the picture alone, interviews and music will be able to continue, whether the audience can accurately understand your story, if used, your explanation is superfluous, your commentary is simple and concise, often It is hard to believe. We have seen outstanding documentaries both at home and abroad with such outstanding works as no explanation, pictures and words, such as “migrating birds” and “returning trains”, but also with precise, beautiful and logical explanations Works such as “Fahrenheit 911”, “Stolen from Stolen,” “born in a brothel” like this. It can be seen that both the commentary and the voiceover, if handled properly, are one of the best and most effective ways to promote story development. One or two sentences