论文部分内容阅读
鲁迅曾经说过:看社会因作者而不同,看作品因读者而不同。这个不同似乎就注定了批评的相对性。所谓“经学家看见易,道学家看见淫”,则是这种相对性的生动注脚。因此问题几乎是自明的,批评只能因人而异。然而,此处的“人”却有三个层次,借用墨子的话,它可以是“达名”,可以是“类名”,也可以是“私名”。“达名”之人即普遍性意义上的人,是人的全部和整体;“类名”之人是人的一个部份或类别,“私名”之人则是指具体的个别的人。比如“人”“作家”“鲁迅”便是上述三种指称的次第。不用说,“私名”之人即个人,才是那个“因人而异”中的“人”.
Lu Xun once said: Look at the society because of different authors, depending on the reader to see the work of different. This difference seems doomed to the relativity of criticism. The so-called “scholars see Yi, Taoist see prostitution”, is a vivid note of this relativity. So the question is almost self-evident, and criticism can only vary from person to person. However, there are three levels of “people” here. To borrow Mozi, it can be “famous”, “class name”, or “private name.” “Named” people are people in the universal sense, they are all people and whole people; “class name” people are a part or category, “private name” people are specific individual people . Such as “people” “writer” “Lu Xun” is the second of the above three allegations. Needless to say, the “private name” person is the individual, is that “from person to person” in the “people.”