论文部分内容阅读
文柱同志: 大作论吴均三书(见本刊1989年第11期),分析批评,至为精当。惟同意时贤以三书比柳宗元山水记之言,则不敢苟同。柳氏山水记人多称道其实所记乃死山水也,有山水而无感情,令人不喜。执事又引时贤之言,谓‘吴少许是比郦多许’,此言亦不敢苟同。愚以为山水之作,当以郦道元为第一,郦氏以历史与地理、人事与风景结合为文,故其所写山水有生命、有感情,其规模之巨大,文章之空灵,古今所绝仅有。吴氏当在其次,柳氏斯为下矣。
Comrade Wenzhu: great works of Wu Jun three books (see this issue in 1989 No. 11), analysis and criticism, as fine. However, Yin agreed with three books than Liu Zongyuan landscape remember words, you can not agree. Liu Shui landscape calligrapher praised in fact remember the dead landscape, there is no emotion and landscape, it is unpleasant. The deacon also quoted the words of Yin, saying that “Wu is a little more than a shit,” and his statement does not agree. I foolishly think of landscape as the first Taoist Yuan as the first, Cheshi with history and geography, human combination with the scenery for the article, so the written landscape life, feelings, its size is huge, essay ethereal, ancient and modern There must be only Wu when the next, Liu Si Si for the next carry on.