在当前的语文课堂中,对经典的误读比较普遍。如:“打官司要有证据,法庭只重视证据,窦娥之冤的根源就在于无法证明自己的无辜。”“鲁提辖是一个知法犯法的凶手。”“刘兰芝被赶出焦府是因为没有生小孩。”笔者在听课过程中也亲身遭 In the current Chinese classroom, the classic misreading is more common. Such as: “litigation to have evidence, the court only attaches great importance to evidence, Dou E’s injustice lies in the inability to prove his innocence. ” “Lutheran jurisdiction is a killer.” Out of the coke House because there is no child. "The author also personally during the lecture