《老子》一书是道家学派最早问世而且价值最高的一部经典,也是道教的“圣经”。由于该书言简意赅,哲理深奥,后人在理解和解说上便产生种种分歧。这本不足为奇,它正是后世学派林立、百家争鸣的根源之一。尽管如此,我们今天研究老子思想,还是应当以文献为依据尽可能作出符合原意的解释而避免望文生义、主观臆想的。本文仅举三例试作辨正,求教方家。1.是“自是者不章”还是“自视者不章”? “Lao Tzu” book is the earliest Taoist school and the highest value of a classic, but also the Taoist “Bible.” Because the book is concise, philosophical esoteric, future generations will have all kinds of differences in understanding and commentary. This is not surprising, it is one of the root causes of the proliferation of schools of thought in later generations. Nevertheless, we should study Lao Tzu today, or should we try to make explanations that accord with the original intention as much as possible on the basis of the documents to avoid the literal and subjective conjecture. This article only cites three examples of discrimination, seeking to teach the family. 1. Is “self is not chapter” or “self-assessment is not chapter”?