论文部分内容阅读
2015年11月11日,上海市浦东新区人民法院,判决了中国大陆首例流量劫持案,两名被告人均受到了刑事制裁。该判决首次在司法层面将流量劫持认定为犯罪,一时间轰动于刑事法领域。本文提出这个案件,并不是为了分析该案的定性问题,而是以此案为引,探讨侦查机关电话通知犯罪行为人到案,且其到案后如实供述犯罪事实,能否认定为自首,若能,则应该适用我国刑法第67条关于自首的哪一款规定的问题。
On November 11, 2015, the Pudong New District People’s Court in Shanghai ordered the first case of traffic jail hijacking in mainland China, and both defendants were subjected to criminal sanctions. The ruling for the first time in the judicial level of traffic hijacking as a criminal, for a time sensation in the field of criminal law. This case is not intended to analyze the qualitative issue of the case. Instead, it refers to the case as a reference to probe into whether the investigating authority phone will notify the criminal of the crime and whether the criminal facts can be truthfully surrendered after the case is brought to an admission. If so, we should apply Article 67 of our Criminal Law about which provision of surrender.