论文部分内容阅读
中西方音乐史学以及音乐历史编纂学中普遍存在着的差异,早为学界默认。如果说,这也算是一个普遍存在于中西方音乐史学界的“史实”而早已被司空见惯的话,那么,对形成这样差异产生和存在的原因究竟是什么?面对同样的研究对象,有没有一种对学科及学科理论的共识?即什么叫音乐史?本文对中西方音乐史学家关注的“音乐历史”的本质的追问,导出了中西方音乐史学观与史学理论及其诉求完全不同的两种史学体系。
The prevalence of differences in Chinese and Western music historiography and music history compilation has long been the default in academia. If we say that this can be regarded as a “historical fact” prevailing in the history of music historians in China and the West, it has long been commonplace to say that what is the reason for the emergence and existence of such differences? In the face of the same subject matter, What is the history of music? This essay traces the essence of the “music history” that the Chinese and Western music historians are concerned with and expounds the theories and their demands of Chinese and Western music historiography and history. Two completely different historical systems.