通过对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的分析,阐述以期刊影响因子作为单篇论文学术质量评价指标的局限性及正确认识“假引”现象对单篇论文学术质量评价的意义。认为对于单篇论文应运用期刊影响因子、总被引频次并结合同行评议及论文的社会价值等进行综合评价,并应采取相应的措施减少甚至杜绝“假引”问题。 By analyzing the phenomenon of “false quotation” in a series of papers published by a certain subject group, this paper elaborates the limitations of the journal impact factor as an evaluation index of the academic quality of a single essay and the correct understanding of the phenomenon of “false quotation” The significance of academic quality evaluation. It considers that the comprehensive evaluation should be made on the influencing factors of the periodicals, the total number of cited cites and the social values ​​of peer review and theses, and the corresponding measures should be taken to reduce or even eliminate the “false quotation”.