论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出传统刑法学认为,只要行为人在有刑事责任能力的情况下,而故意或过失实施侵害法益的行为,发生法益侵害的结果,并且该行为与结果之间有因果关系的场合,行为人应当对法益侵害结果负责。但是,作为刑事归责的基本原理的自我答责理论的关注重点并不在于此。在自我答责理论看来,决定性的并不是行为人的故意或过失心理态度,也不是特定行为与结果之间的物理意义上的因果关系,重要的是行为人是否应当对损害结果的不发生而负责。~([1])因此,如果能够得出被害人应当对损害结果的不发生负责的话,那么,该法益侵害结果就不得归属于行为人。
First, the problem raised Traditional criminal law believes that as long as the perpetrator has the ability to criminal liability, and intentional or negligent acts of infringement of the law, the result of the infringement of interests, and the behavior and the results of a causal relationship between the occasion , The perpetrator shall be responsible for the result of lawsuit violation. However, the focus of self-responsibility theory, which is the basic principle of criminal responsibility, does not lie here. In the self-accountability theory, the decisive factor is not the actor’s intentional or negligent psychological attitude, nor is it the physical meaning of the causal relationship between the specific behavior and the result. It is important whether the perpetrator should have any effect on the damage result And responsible. Therefore, if it can be concluded that the victim should be held responsible for the non-occurrence of the damage result, the result of the legal infringement should not be attributed to the actor.