论文部分内容阅读
现行《著作权法》著作报酬权立法模式采用隐性与显性相结合的立法模式,具有“显著法定性”特征,送审稿仅采用隐性报酬权的立法模式,具有弱化著作报酬权显性法定性特征趋向。该趋向与我国目前著作权保护司法现实不相适应,还可能带来意想不到的不利于著作权保护的后果。送审稿弱化著作报酬权显性法定性特征,与强化报酬权实现的市场决定倾向性是分不开的,但在立法上混淆了显性法定报酬权与报酬权实现的界限。应对送审稿第52条进行修订、补充。
The legislative mode of the present copyright law, which adopts the combination of the implicit and the explicit, has the characteristic of “significant statutory nature” and the draft mode of review only adopts the legislative mode of implicit remuneration, which has the effect of weakening the right of remuneration Dominant statutory features trend. This trend is incompatible with the present judicial reality of copyright protection in our country and may bring unexpected consequences that are unfavorable to copyright protection. Weakening the weakness of the draft for reviewing the statutory characteristics of remuneration is not separate from the market-oriented tendency of remuneration, but confounds the boundaries of the statutory remuneration and remuneration. Article 52 of the draft for examination shall be revised and supplemented.