论文部分内容阅读
涂尔干从社会学角度勾画出从压制性法到恢复性法的演化路径,学者们从理论与经验层面对其进行了批评与检验。理论层面的批评集中在道德法律同一论、法律演化理论的虚构性及其具体内容的缺漏三方面;经验层面的检验则对从压制性法到恢复性法的演化顺序提出了挑战。其实,理论层面的批评忽略了法律演化理论的道德批判目的并遗漏了文本细节,而经验层面的检验存在方法论上的局限并误读了涂尔干的理论。涂尔干注重理论建构而对事实作简化处理,确保了理论体系的明确性,为当下中国的法社会学研究树立了典范。
Durkheim delineated from the angle of sociology the path of evolution from repressive law to restorative law, and scholars criticized and tested it from the theoretical and empirical aspects. Criticism at the theoretical level focuses on the three aspects of the same theory of moral law, the fictionality of legal evolution theory and the omission of specific content. The empirical test challenges the order of evolution from repressive law to restorative law. In fact, theoretical criticism ignores the purpose of moral criticism of legal evolution theory and omits the textual details, while the empirical level test has methodological limitations and misread Durkheim’s theory. Durkheim paid attention to the theoretical construction and simplifies the facts, ensured the clarity of the theoretical system and set an example for the research of law and sociology in present China.