论文部分内容阅读
对文学文本解读的低效或无效,正威胁着文学理论的合法性。西方文论往往追求哲学的普遍性,以高度抽象甚至超验的演绎牺牲文学文本的独特性。传统哲学主客二元对立统一的思维模式,无法对应文学文本由主体、客体和形式构成的三维结构。西方文论之失,还在于方法上以定义、观念的谱系为纲,其极端者甚至以文学不可定义否定文学的存在。解决文学文本解读有效性的关键在于,揭示文学文本是由表层的意象、中层的意脉和深层的规范形式构成的立体结构。保证审美价值最大限度升值的是规范形式。规范形式与原生形式有异,经典作品常以自己独特的风格对规范形式形成冲击,并使其更加丰富。文学文本解读的任务,是借助多层次的具体分析,把文学理论在普遍抽象的过程中牺牲了的特殊性、唯一性的精致密码还原出来,达到最大限度的有效性。
The inefficient or ineffective interpretation of literary texts is threatening the legitimacy of literary theory. Western literary theory often pursues the universality of philosophy and sacrifices the uniqueness of literary texts with highly abstract and even transcendental interpretations. The traditional dualism of the subject and object of traditional philosophy mode of thinking, can not correspond to the literary text by the subject, object and form of the three-dimensional structure. The loss of western literary theory also lies in its methodological definition of the lineage of concepts as the key link, and its extremes even negate the existence of literature by literary indefinable. The key to resolving the validity of literary texts lies in revealing the three-dimensional structure of literary texts formed by the image of the surface, the meaning of the middle layer and the deep standard form. Guarantee the maximum appreciation of aesthetic value is the standard form. The normative form is different from the original form, and the classic works often impact the normative form with its own unique style and make it more abundant. The task of reading literary texts is to restore to the utmost validity the multidimensional and specific analysis of the unique and unique delicate password sacrificed in the process of universal abstract of literary theory.