论文部分内容阅读
烛光有两个地方未曾到达:太远的地方和蜡烛下面。法律实证分析也是一样。对法律实证分析来说,象公平、正义、本质、本原这些范畴都似乎有些遥远,而法律条文本身,也很少成为法律实证分析的对象。本文认为,对法律条文其实可以进行实证分析。一、法条:实证分析的对象?通常,可使用实证分析方法进行分析的法律信息,往往是大量的案例、法律关系主体、测量法律意识的问卷、法律行为的证据、痕迹、法律实施的资源设施等等。研究这些法律信息之所以可以选用实证分析的方法,是因为这些法律信息一般具有符合法律实证分析所要求的三个基本特征:第一,这些法律信息都是具有相当规模的事件,是具有同样单位因而可进行标准化处理和计算的大量
There are two places where the candlelight never reaches: far below and the candle below. The same is true of legal empirical analysis. For the legal empirical analysis, such categories as fairness, justice, essence and origin seem far apart, and the legal provisions themselves rarely become the object of legal positivism analysis. This article argues that the legal provisions can in fact be analyzed empirically. First, the law: the object of empirical analysis? Usually, the legal information can be analyzed using empirical analysis methods, often a large number of cases, the main body of legal relations, the questionnaire to measure legal awareness, evidence of legal acts, traces of law enforcement resources Facilities and more. The reason why these legal information can be used for empirical analysis is that these legal information generally have the following three basic characteristics required by legal empirical analysis: first, the legal information is a matter of considerable scale and has the same unit Thus a large number of standardized processes and calculations can be performed