论文部分内容阅读
对碧兰在牙体牙髓治疗中的临床疗效进行探究、分析。本文选取本院在近几年时间内收治的180例牙体牙髓病患者,随机将其均分为两组,对照组和实验组,每组患者为90例,其中对照组患者采用的麻醉方式为利用利多卡因进行麻醉,实验组采用的麻醉方式为利用碧兰进行麻醉,对两组患者的麻醉效果以及患者的满意程度进行相关的记录、比较。结果是实验组患者的总有效率高达95.56%,而对照组患者的总有效率为86.67%,可见实验组患者的总有效率明显高于对照组患者;实验组患者的无效麻醉率为4.44%,而对照组患者的无效麻醉率高达13.33%,可见实验组患者的无效麻醉率明显低于对照组;实验组患者满意度高达97.78%,对照组患者的满意度为88.89%,可见实验组患者的满意度明显高于对照组的满意程度。在牙体牙髓病治疗过程中,碧兰具有良好的麻醉效果,而且患者对碧兰这一麻醉方式较为满意,因此应该在临床上对碧兰进行大力的推广应用。
Brilliant in the dental pulp treatment of clinical efficacy of exploration and analysis. This article selected our hospital in recent years admitted 180 cases of dental pulp disease patients were randomly divided into two groups, the control group and the experimental group, 90 patients in each group, in which the control group of patients with anesthesia The way to use lidocaine for anesthesia, experimental group anesthesia for the use of Bilan anesthesia, the two groups of patients with anesthesia and patient satisfaction related records, comparison. The results showed that the total effective rate was 95.56% in the experimental group, while the total effective rate in the control group was 86.67%. The total effective rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group; the ineffective anesthesia rate in the experimental group was 4.44% , While the control group of patients with ineffective anesthesia rate as high as 13.33%, showing that the experimental group of patients with ineffective anesthesia was significantly lower than the control group; satisfaction of patients in the experimental group as high as 97.78%, 88.89% in the control group of patients satisfaction, we can see the experimental group patients Satisfaction was significantly higher than the control group’s satisfaction. In the treatment of dental pulp disease, Bilan has a good anesthetic effect, and patients are more satisfied with the Bilan anesthesia, it should clinically Brilliant vigorously promote the application.