中国名辩学说被誉为世界三大古典逻辑之一。《墨辩》则是中国古代逻辑辉煌成就的标志,有人认为它几乎可以和亚里士多德的《工具论》相比美。《墨辩》中提出了“或”“假”“效”“辟”“侔”“援”“推”等颇具中国味道的推理形式,其中特别对“侔”进行了大量阐述和论证。然而引起当时及后世争议最多的也正是这个侔式推论,很多问题至今尚未形成定论。对此,笔者拟从新的角度采用与 China’s famous doctrine has been hailed as one of the world’s three classical logic. The “ink debate” is a symbol of the brilliant achievements of ancient Chinese logic. Some people think that it is almost comparable to Aristotle’s “tool theory.” There are many inferential forms of Chinese flavor such as “or” “fake”, “effect”, “plutonium”, “aid” and “push” in the “ink debate”, in which a great deal of exposition and argumentation are carried out. However, the most controversial issue that aroused the most controversy at the time and in the future is precisely this pratical inference. Many issues have not yet reached a conclusion so far. In this regard, I intend to use a new perspective