论文部分内容阅读
责任人不明确的高楼坠物致人伤害案件自重庆“烟灰缸案”以来一直争议不断,《侵权责任法》第87条有明确的规定,但是该规定缺乏法理基础,也不符合情理。本文从诉讼法的归责原则、举证责任、责任主体、法律和法院的局限性等角度对高楼坠物致人伤害责任问题进行了评析,提出了不能让可能的一个群体承担赔偿责任的理由,同时阐明了《侵权责任法》第87条的负面影响。
Since the “ashtray case” has been controversial, the tort liability law explicitly stipulates in Article 87, but the provision lacks the legal basis and does not conform to the principle . This article analyzes the liability for injuries caused by falling objects in high buildings from the principle of attribution of litigation, the burden of proof, the main body of responsibility, the limitations of law and the courts, and puts forward the reasons why one group that may not be liable for compensation should be liable. At the same time, the negative impact of Article 87 of Tort Liability Act was clarified.