商标评审案件审理在适用商标法律规定时,常常遇到在法律条文中难以对号入座的问题,致使在具体案件审理适用法律规定时,时常会出现对法律规定的理解与适用不一致的情况。本文试图就“海棠湾”商标(以下称争议商标)争议案的法律适用作一简单评析探讨法律适用。【案情】三亚市海棠湾管理委员会(以下简称申请人)认为:1.“海棠湾”经过海南省及三亚市政府及社会各界十余年的规划开发,其所拥有的巨大商业 Trial of Trademark Accreditation Cases When applying the provisions of the trademark law, they often encounter the problem of being difficult to check-in in the legal provisions, which often leads to inconsistencies in understanding and application of the law when hearing the application of legal provisions in specific cases. This article attempts to make a brief comment on the legal application of the controversial case of “Haitang Bay” (the “Disputed Trademark”) to discuss the application of law. [Case] ​​Begonia Bay Management Committee of Sanya (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) that: 1. “Haitang Bay ” after Hainan Province and Sanya city government and community planning more than ten years of development, which has a huge commercial