论文部分内容阅读
目的分析剖宫产手术方式对二次妇产科手术的影响。方法选取2010年10月至2012年10月在林州市人民医院进行二次妇产科手术的100例患者作为观察对象,随机将其分为观察组与对照组,观察组行新式剖宫产,对照组行传统剖宫产,观察两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及并发症发生情况,比较不同剖宫产方法对二次妇产科手术的影响。结果观察组手术时间较长,术中出血量较大,术后恢复排气时间较长,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组患者腹腔粘连发生情况较多,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者切口愈合情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新式剖宫产术患者因腹腔粘连严重,在二次妇产科手术中出血量较大,手术时间长,术后恢复排气时间长,为提高二次妇产科手术的效果需谨慎第一次手术操作,减少粘连的发生。
Objective To analyze the effect of cesarean section on secondary gynecological surgery. Methods From October 2010 to October 2012 in Linzhou People’s Hospital, 100 cases of obstetrics and gynecology patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, observation group new cesarean section . The control group underwent traditional cesarean section. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications were observed. The effects of different cesarean section methods on the second gynecological surgery were compared. Results The observation group had longer operation time, larger amount of bleeding during operation, longer recovery time after operation, and significant difference compared with the control group (P <0.05). In the observation group, there was more abdominal adhesions, The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in incision healing between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusions The patients with new cesarean section had severe peritoneal adhesions, large amount of bleeding in secondary obstetrics and gynecology surgery, long operation time and long recovery time after operation. To improve the effect of secondary obstetrics and gynecology surgery, A surgical operation to reduce the occurrence of adhesions.