论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析了解我国医学论文叙词标引的现状和问题,促进医学期刊论文标引质量的提高。方法:随机选择医学期刊55种,包括中华系列医学期刊17种,高校学报医学版12种,其他医学期刊26种;按期刊名称检索《中国生物医学文献光盘数据库》(CBM),选择 CBM 已经完成了叙词标引的最近一期期刊的全部论文,对这些论文的原始主题标引(关键词标注)状况,以及 CBM 叙词标引状况进行统计分析。结果:①在统计期刊中,15(27.27%)种期刊对刊载文献全部做了关键词标注;②在统计期刊全部论文中,关键词标注率为72.06%,关键词标注与 CBM 叙词标引符合率为33.96%,关键词标注与 CBM 叙词标引完全一致的论文仅占6.03%;③统计期刊论文中,关键词篇均标注数量为3.69个,仅为 CBM 叙词标引数量的54.13%(叙词标引率)。结论:医学期刊论文的叙词标引虽已受到重视,但还不普及,仍有相当的文献没有关键词标注;医学期刊论文的关键词标注数量较少,与叙词标引的符合率较低,显示医学期刊论文关键词标注的准确性、合理性和全面性有待提高。提示在医学期刊的编辑工作中应该加强对论文关键词标注的规范化管理,作为医疗科技人员同样应该重视论文关键词标注,掌握关键词标注的方法和技巧。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and understand the status quo and problems of thesaurus in medical papers in China, and to promote the improvement of the indexing quality of papers in medical journals. Methods: 55 kinds of medical journals were randomly selected, including 17 kinds of medical journals in China, 12 kinds of medical journals of universities and colleges, and 26 kinds of other medical journals. The CBM of China Biomedical Literature Database was searched according to the journal name, and CBM was completed All papers in the most recent issue of the thesaurus indexed statistical analyzes of the status of the original thematic index (keyword tagging) and CBM thesaurus indexing of these papers. Results: ①In the statistical periodical, 15 (27.27%) journals made key words to all the published articles; ② In all the statistical periodicals, 72.06% of the key words were marked, and the key words and CBM descriptors were indexed The coincidence rate was 33.96%, and the papers that exactly match the key words and the CBM thesaurus index accounted for only 6.03%. ③ In the statistics periodical papers, the number of key words was 3.69, only 54.13 % (Thesaurus index rate). Conclusion: Although the index of medical journal articles has received the attention, but it is not yet universal, there is still no literature about key words. The number of keywords in medical journal articles is less, and the coincidence rate of the index with the thesaurus Low, indicating that the accuracy of the medical journal keynote annotation, rationality and comprehensiveness to be improved. It is suggested that the standardization of key words labeling should be strengthened in the editing of medical journals. As medical scientists and technologists, it should also pay attention to the method of keyword annotation and mastering key words.