论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨在基层医院应用经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗前列腺增生症(BPH)的前景。方法通过对照组(耻骨上经膀胱前列腺摘除术68例)和治疗组(经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术70例)比较两组前列腺増生症患者的手术时间、出血量、留置尿管时间、并发症、症状改善等指标,以比较两种术式的优缺点。结果治疗组(经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术)在手术时间、出血量、留置尿管时间、并发症等指标优于对照组(耻骨上经膀胱前列腺摘除术)。结论经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术具有安全性高、易掌握、并发症少、疗效确切等优点,优于耻骨上经膀胱前列腺摘除术,适合于基层医院开展。
Objective To explore the prospect of transurethral prostate bipolar resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in primary hospitals. Methods The control group (68 cases of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy) and the treatment group (70 cases of transurethral prostate plasma bipolar resection) were enrolled in this study. The operative time, blood loss, catheterization time, Complications, symptoms and other indicators to improve, to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical procedures. Results The treatment group (transurethral prostate bipolar bipolar surgery) was superior to the control group (suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy) at operation time, bleeding volume, indwelling catheter time and complications. Conclusion Transurethral resection of prostate bipolar plasmapheresis has the advantages of high safety, easy to grasp, less complications and definite curative effect. It is superior to the suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy and is suitable for the primary hospital.