论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨老年患者固定义齿修复与可摘义齿修复的临床效果差异,为老年患者义齿修复方式选择提供参考。方法选择我院收治的进行义齿修复的老年患者80例,按照修复方式差异,分为固定组41例,行固定义齿修复术;可摘组39例,行可摘义齿修复术。对比两组患者的修复效果。结果观察组术后4个月,咀嚼功能、固定效果、舒适度以及面部修复情况均优于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,两组患者治疗周期和疗效感受之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组费用略低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论老年患者固定义齿修复效果显著,改善了咀嚼的功能,并具有较高的舒适度。然而,费用高于可摘义齿修复,并具有一定的应用限制性,因此可根据患者具体情况酌情选择。
Objective To explore the difference of clinical effect between fixed denture and removable denture in senile patients and to provide reference for the choice of denture repair methods in elderly patients. Methods Eighty elderly patients undergoing denture restoration were selected and divided into fixed group (n = 41) and fixed denture (n = 39) according to the different methods of repair. Comparison of two groups of patients repair effect. Results In the observation group 4 months after operation, masticatory function, fixation effect, comfort and facial repair were better than the control group (P <0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the treatment period and the therapeutic effect (P> 0.05). The cost of the observation group was slightly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Elderly patients with fixed denture repair effect is significant, improve the chewing function, and has a high degree of comfort. However, the cost is higher than that of the removable denture and has some application limits, so it can be selected according to the patient’s specific conditions.