论文部分内容阅读
目的观察利普刀与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法将386例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为利普刀治疗组(观察组)190例和微波治疗组(对照组)196例。观察组采用阴道镜引导下利普刀治疗;对照组采用微波治疗,比较两种治疗方法的临床疗效。结果观察组和对照组总有效率分别为98.42%和88.78%,观察组有效率高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术平均时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05);两组术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义。结论利普刀治疗宫颈糜烂手术时间短,临床疗效优于微波治疗组,是治疗慢性宫颈炎症的有效治疗措施。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Lipu Dao and microwave in the treatment of cervical erosion. Methods A total of 386 cases of cervical erosion were randomly divided into Lipopeptide-treated group (observation group) and microwave-treated group (196 cases). The observation group under the guidance of colposcopy Lipper knife treatment; control group using microwave treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two treatment methods. Results The total effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 98.42% and 88.78% respectively. The effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, with significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). The mean operative time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of bleeding during operation. Conclusion Lipu knife treatment of cervical erosion is short, the clinical efficacy is better than microwave treatment group, is an effective treatment for chronic cervicitis.