在编完这篇精彩的文章后,其中有一句话让我不吐不快。周涛说评论家不会说人话,文学就是说人话的。这种一闪而过的自信我不知道有多少可靠性?时下文坛一些形形色色的作品哪里是在说人话?前段时间我读了两位著名作家关于生命的长篇对话,貌似严肃但是充斥着低级与迷乱的东西,使我感到莫名其妙,尤其是吹捧《圣经》而贬低佛经,显得很无知。小说呢?瞎编瞎谝的太普遍了,所用伎俩无非是那两下子,像垃圾一样。从古至今的所谓大部头的文学作品,我看需要重新反思的也是很多的。有些作品也许在某个历史的细节戒环节上发生了一些作用,但是对于今天的社会与个人,除了文物的价值之外,鲜活的东西还有多少?另外99％的所谓成功作品是靠着对两性关系的探索而炫耀一时,而这些东西对一个肉体上渐趋衰老而心灵却越来越迷茫的人究竟有多大意义?当然,地球上有许多人们共仰的精神领袖也常常不是被迷惑于地上,而更多的是被迷惑于天上——迷惑于他们自己的感受和想象之中。何况许多我们周围的文学家呢?在这个时代,许许多多的文学象恐怕已将文学更多地看成是一种职业,一个赖以为生的饭碗。因而他们的所谓艺术也仅仅是雕虫小技。 在这种情形下,我们确实需要一些“判断”。 周涛在“山河判断”的影子之下,做了一次大无畏的“文学判断”。他一贯文风的老练深算与大气磅礴在这个访谈的天才思辩中依然显露出来。这篇“判断”式的大作其“判断”的气势与对于文坛的愤愤不平都使我受到感染。 周涛的散文,尤其是他许多篇幅不长的作品,那种在形式上所达到的完美在近10年的中国文坛当是登峰造极的,但是据说他的散文集卖得并不火热,这应该是可想而知的。卖得火热的“学问”,古人叫“曲学”,“曲学”必然是“阿世”的。 我想史铁生那几篇优秀的中短篇小说,也不一定能给他带来多少版税。谁都知道纳博科夫的小说《洛莉塔》卖得很好,但他的《普宁》、《黑暗中的笑声》等小说呢?有一些作品如果卖得不错,想必写得也不会太差,那必然是非常现实的作品。而在终极意义上试图成为一流的东西,它与现实永远是有距离的。但是纯粹的非现实与纯粹的现实一样,又都是走投无路,无门可入的。也可能一个简单的概念或想法就可以制造出一篇别出心裁的中长篇小说,并受读者喜爱,一二百年的历史证明这绝不是罕见。 文坛乃至文化界清浊待分,看来已经到了“判断”的时候了,但愿周涛先生这番谈话真正是鸣于九皋、而声闻九天的仙鹤之音。 After compiling this wonderful article, one of them made me cry. Zhou Tao said critics do not speak human, literature is human. This flash of confidence I do not know how much reliability? Now some of the literary world where a variety of works are talking about people? Some time ago I read two famous writers on life’s long dialogue, seemingly serious but full of low-level And confused things make me feel puzzled, especially praised the Bible and belittle the Buddhist scriptures, it seems very ignorant. It is too general to make a blind book, and the trick is nothing more than junk. Since ancient times, the so-called most of the literature, I think there is a lot to be reconsidered. Some works may have played a role in the details of a certain history, but what about living besides today’s society and individuals besides the value of cultural relics? Another 99% of the so-called successful works rely on To show off the exploration of the relationship between the sexes, and how meaningful are these people to a person who is getting physically aging and whose mind is getting lost? Of course, there are many spiritual leaders who are common people on Earth and are often not deceived On the earth, and more are confused in heaven - confused in their own feelings and imagination. Moreover, many of the writers around us. In this era, a great many literary figures may have regarded literature more as a career and a dependent life job. Therefore, their so-called art is just a gnome technique. In this situation, we really need some “judgment.” Under the shadow of “judging mountains and rivers,” Zhou Tao made a dauntless “literary judgment.” He has always been the style of profound abstruse and magnificent in this interview genius debate still revealed. This “judgment” masterpiece infects me because of his “judgments” and its indignation at the literary world. Zhou Tao’s essay, especially many of his short works, the formal Chinese literary world that has achieved perfection for almost 10 years is a culmination of the Chinese literary world, but his essay collection is said to be not selling well, which should be One can imagine. Selling hot “learning”, the ancients called “Qu Xue”, “Qu Xue” must be “A World”. I think Steve Jobs that a few good short stories, it does not necessarily give him how much royalties. Everyone knows that Nabokov’s novel Lolita sold well, but what about his novels Puning and Laughter in the Dark? Some works, if sold well, must not have been written Will be poor, it must be a very realistic work. In the ultimate sense of trying to be first-class, it is always far from reality. However, the purely unrealistic reality is just as permissive and unmanageable as the pure reality. It is also possible that a simple concept or idea can produce a novelty novel that is loved by the readers. It has never been unusual for one or two hundred years of history to prove it. Literary circles and even the cultural world have to wait and see, it seems that it has come to “judge.” It is hoped that Mr. Zhou Tao’s remarks really shouted at Jiu Gao while the sound of the Crane heard nine days.