一文学課本脫离了三方面的实际从“人民教育”所發表的有关語文教学問題討論的一些文章看来,对于高中文学課本(指已出版的第一、二册,下同)的看法,大概有兩种:一种是拥护这一套課本的;一种認为教材分量重,教师授課、学生学習都感觉吃力。就中以耶非同志的“从实际情况来看”(“人民教育”一九五六年十月号)与微语同志的“有关文学課目的任务的一个問題”(“人民教育”一九五七年一月号)等文章比较接近实际。我 A literary text has been separated from the three aspects of the actual “People’s Education” published by some articles on the issue of language teaching, the textbook for high school (referring to the first published two volumes, the same below) view, There are about two: one is to support this set of textbooks; one that textbooks weight, teachers teaching, students feel difficult. With regard to “From a Practical Perspective” (“The People’s Education”, October 1956 issue) of Comrade Yehfei and Comrade Microfeh, “A Question about the Tasks Related to Literature Studies” (“People’s Education” January 57) and other articles are more realistic. I