论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析血透室危重患者交接流程中的不安全因素,探讨实施相应的防范管理对策。方法:选择2015年6月~2016年6月医院收治的136例血透室危重患者作为研究对象,对其资料进行回顾性分析,将运用新型交接方式的72例患者作为观察组,将运用传统交接方式的64例患者作为对照组。总结血透室危重患者交接流程中的不安全因素,分析比较两组患者的住院时间、医生对护理评分及患者对护理满意度等情况。结果:观察组患者的住院时间为(20.50±9.10)d、医生对护理评分为(94.30±2.50)分、患者对护理满意度为98.61%,均好于对照组患者,差别显著(P<0.05)。结论:血透室危重患者在交接流程中存在不安全因素,针对这行不安全因素,施行新型交接方式,能够显著改善血透室危重患者的治疗效果,提高患者满意度。
Objective: To analyze the unsafe factors in the delivery process of critically ill patients in hemodialysis room and to explore the corresponding countermeasures for prevention and control. Methods: 136 critically ill patients with hemodialysis admitted to our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were selected as the research objects. The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. The 72 patients who took the new delivery method as the observation group were enrolled in the study. Sixty-four patients in the delivery mode served as control group. To summarize the unsafe factors in the delivery process of critically ill patients in the hemodialysis room, and to analyze and compare the length of stay in the two groups, the doctor’s ratings of nursing care and patient satisfaction with nursing. Results: The length of stay in the observation group was (20.50 ± 9.10) days, the score of the nursing staff was (94.30 ± 2.50), the satisfaction degree of the patients in the nursing was 98.61%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.05 ). Conclusion: In the critical procedure of hemodialysis patients, there are some unsafe factors in the delivery process. In view of the unsafe factors in this hemodialysis room, a new delivery method can be applied to significantly improve the therapeutic effect and improve patient satisfaction in critical hemodialysis patients.