论文部分内容阅读
本文从历史和理论两方面对俄罗斯形式论学派与布拉格学派的文论思想进行比较,对流行于学界的这样一种看法提出质疑,即布拉格学派文论长久以来被视为俄罗斯形式论学派文论的简单延续和翻版。从历史角度看,俄罗斯形式论学派对布拉格学派的影响虽是确凿的,但我们不可因此将这种影响极端化、绝对化。事实上,俄罗斯形式论学派只是布拉格学派文论众多思想来源的一支,布拉格学派文论也绝不是俄罗斯形式论学派文论的重演,而是有着自身高度的理论原创性和辐射力。
This article compares the theory of literary theory of the Russian formalism with that of the Prague school from both the historical and the theoretical aspects, and puts forward a question on the popular view that the literary theory of the Prague school has long been regarded as the literary theory of the Russian formalism school Simple continuation and piracy. From a historical point of view, although the influence of the Russian formalism school on the Prague school is conclusive, we must not make it extremely radical and absolute. In fact, the Russian formalism school is only one source of many ideas in the literary theory of the Prague school. The literary theory of the Prague school is by no means a repetition of the formal theory of the Russian formalism school, but has its own highly theoretical originality and radiation force.