论文部分内容阅读
仲裁案件的不公开审理和仲裁的保密义务是两个不同的概念,不能混为一谈。国际上对仲裁不公开审理的法律规定与实践做法基本是一致的,但对仲裁的保密义务却颇具分歧,分别以英国和澳大利亚为代表。英国承认存在保密义务,法律允许有披露的例外;澳大利亚不承认仲裁存在保密义务,除非当事人在协议中订明保密义务。仲裁保密义务是从事国际仲裁的一项重要纪律,加强仲裁保密纪律是提高中国仲裁机构乃至中国仲裁形象的一个重要问题,应引起业界的高度重视。
Arbitration cases are not open trials and arbitration obligations of confidentiality are two different concepts, can not be confused. Internationally, the law and practice of not adjudicating arbitration are basically the same, but the obligations of confidentiality of arbitration are quite different, which are respectively represented by Britain and Australia. The United Kingdom recognizes the existence of a duty of confidentiality and the law allows for disclosure exceptions; Australia does not recognize the existence of a duty of confidentiality for arbitration unless the parties set out the obligation of confidentiality in the agreement. Arbitration of confidentiality obligations is an important discipline in international arbitration. Strengthening arbitration and confidentiality discipline is an important issue for enhancing the arbitration institutions in China and even the image of arbitration in China and should arouse the attention of the industry.