论文部分内容阅读
刑事案件中,多人一致的说法未必就是客观的。半年前,我办理的一起故意伤害案,被害人为了多获得赔偿,隐瞒事实真相,故意栽赃他人就是证明。2004年5月11日下午6时许,因怀疑发放工钱不均,犯罪嫌疑人王某与罗某、张某动手将包工头鲁某打倒在地后,王某在鲁某的胸口处猛踩一脚,致其肋骨骨折。法医鉴定为轻伤。因公安机关取证不及时,在场的其他民工拿到工钱后都不知去向。刑事侦查卷现有的证据是:罗某、张某一致指认是王某踩鲁某胸口一脚;鲁某在报案时陈述是罗某踩其胸口一脚,后在辨认时指认是王某踩的而非罗某,原因是工人太多,把王某和罗某的人和名字搞混了。
In criminal cases, the unanimity of many people may not be objective. Six months ago, I handled a case of intentional injury. In order to obtain more compensation, the victim concealed the truth and intentionally appropriated others as proof. May 11, 2004 at 6 pm, due to suspicion of unequal wages paid, the suspects Wang and Luomou, Zhang hands contractor foreman Lu down to the ground, Wang fierce step in Lu’s chest A foot, caused by its rib fractures. Forensic identification as minor injuries. Due to the public security organs not timely evidence, the presence of other migrant workers do not know where to get wages. Criminal investigation of the existing evidence is: Luomou, Zhang unilaterally identified as Wang Lu steal a foot; Lu Moumou statement in the report is Luomou stepped on his chest kick, identified after identification is Wang step Rather than Luomou, the reason is that workers too much, to confuse Wang and Luomou people and names.