论文部分内容阅读
辩诉交易制度是西方法律制度的产物,体现了社会资源成本的权衡和考量,我国近几个月来探索的“认罪认罚从宽”制度亦有体现对辩诉交易制度的参考和借鉴。然而从现有制度设计文件和重要会议讲话精神纪要中体现出的核心证明标准问题并未有完整参照国外降低证明标准的角度,在证明标准不可变化的前提下,会产生制度不能达到原有所欲简化效果,同时具体权利也会和刑事基本原理相冲突甚至社会负外部性大于正外部性之类的诸多逻辑和实务矛盾。
The system of plea bargaining is a product of the Western legal system and reflects the trade-offs and considerations of social resource costs. The system of pleading guilty and punishing leniency explored in recent few months in our country also reflects and references the plea bargaining system. However, the core certification standards reflected in the existing system design documents and the keynote speeches do not have a complete reference to the perspective of lowering the standard of proof in foreign countries. Under the premise that the standards can not be changed, systems that fail to achieve the original To simplify the effect, at the same time, the specific rights will conflict with the basic principles of criminal law, and even social negative externalities are more than positive externalities such as many logical and practical contradictions.