论文部分内容阅读
20世纪50—80年代,经济学界发生了一场决定经济学走向的空前激烈的理论争论,即“剑桥资本争论”。这场争论揭示出目前居经济学主流地位的新古典理论的逻辑矛盾。然而,究竟是什么原因导致其理论的逻辑矛盾却没有被揭示出来,特别是争论双方都没有意识到揭示这种逻辑矛盾所暗含的理论意义和经验意义,以致这场争论完全流产。在当前经济危机背景下重新梳理出的“剑桥资本争论”的逻辑内涵,不仅深刻表明逻辑矛盾产生的真正原因所在,而且表明这场争论所引申出的一个重要结论,即目前国民收入核算体系中的所有由货币量值表示的统计变量完全由社会关系或特定的货币金融体系决定,而与主流新古典理论基于生产函数的技术分析无关。
In the 1950s and 1980s, an unprecedentedly heated theoretical debate took place in the field of economics in deciding the direction of economics, namely the Cambridge Capital Argument. This debate reveals the logical contradiction of the neoclassical theory that is currently in the mainstream of economics. However, what causes the logical contradictions of the theory has not been revealed, especially the controversy is completely aborted, especially when both sides of the debate do not realize the theoretical and empirical implications of revealing such logical contradictions. In the context of the current economic crisis, the logical connotation of “Cambridge Capital Argument”, which has been reexplaned in the context of the current economic crisis, not only shows profoundly the true reasons for the emergence of logical contradictions, but also shows an important conclusion drawn from this debate that at present the National Income Accounting System All the statistical variables represented by the monetary value are completely determined by social relations or a specific monetary and financial system, but not with the technical analysis of the production function based on the neoclassical theory of the mainstream.