论文部分内容阅读
汉语文献对族群身份的表述历来已久,其对“异族”形象的书写在近代亦引起诸多反思与论争。以《史记·西南夷列传》为例,司马迁对“西南”之书写用“蛮夷”二字总括,不免粗疏。如若从“西南”与“蛮夷”、“西南”与“一点四方”之关系加以辨析,将有助于对汉语文献传统中异族形象书写之理解。同时,笔者引入《华阳国志·巴志》中“西南”之自表述,在西南第三人称表述的期待中,意在对多民族文学书写的倡导做一回应。
Chinese literature has long been used to describe ethnic identity, and its writing of “alien” images has also caused much reflection and controversy in modern times. Take “Historical Records of Southwest Yi” as an example, Sima Qian’s writing of “Southwest ” is divided into two parts: “barbarians”, which can not be ignored. If we analyze the relation between “Southwest ” and “barbarian ”, “Southwest ” and “little square ”, it will be helpful to understand the writing of alien images in the tradition of Chinese documents. At the same time, the author introduces the self-expression “Southwest” in “Huayang Guoshi · Chi”, and in response to the expectation of the third person in Southwest China, it is intended to respond to the advocacy of multi-ethnic literary writing.