论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较AH-plus根充糊剂和碘仿根充糊剂在一次法根管治疗术中的临床疗效。方法:282个急性牙髓炎患牙随机分成两组。治疗组采用AH-plus+牙胶尖充填根管,对照组采用碘仿根充糊剂+牙胶尖充填根管,观察两组病例术后2天及1年后的临床效果。结果:根管充填2天后复查,治疗组疼痛发生率较对照组低,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。术后一年复查,治疗组疗效优于对照组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:AH-plus根充糊剂临床疗效优于碘仿根充糊剂。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of AH-plus root filling paste and iodoform-based root filling paste in root canal therapy. Methods: 282 teeth with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group was treated with AH-plus + gutta-percha point and the control group with iodoform-fimbriae + gutta-percha tip. The clinical effect of the two groups was observed 2 days and 1 year after operation. Results: After 2 days of root canal filling, the incidence of pain in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). One year after the review, the treatment group than the control group, there was a significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of AH-plus root filling paste is superior to that of iodoform imitation root paste.