论文部分内容阅读
目的:对腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的临床治疗疗效进行探讨。方法:采用资料回顾性分析的方法,将170例经过腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)以及182例经阴式全子宫切除术(VH)患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,将两组在手术时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症以及出血量等进行对比分析。结果:①LAVH组与VH组在术后并发症方面均不存在统计学差异(P>0.05);两组在术中出血与术后住院时间两个方面不存在统计学差异(P>0.05)。②根据患者生存质量评价标准,LAVH患者生存质量得分为(135±8)分,VH患者得分为(100±5)分,两者具有显著的统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论:VH、LAVH两组的临床效果比较相近,与LAVH相比,VH具有手术时间短、术后恢复快以及费用低廉等方面的优点,而LAVH扩大了VH的适应证,比较适合于盆腔粘连较为严重的患者的临床治疗,具有较为广阔的应用及发展前景。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 170 patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 182 cases of vaginal hysterectomy (VH) were retrospectively analyzed by retrospective analysis. Two groups The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and the amount of bleeding were compared. Results: ① There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between LVH group and VH group (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay (P> 0.05). ② According to the quality of life evaluation criteria, the quality of life scores of LAVH patients were (135 ± 8) points, and those of VH patients were (100 ± 5) points. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P <0.01). Conclusion: The clinical effects of VH and LAVH are similar in both groups. Compared with LAVH, VH has the advantages of short operation time, quick recovery after operation and low cost. LAVH expands the indication of VH and is more suitable for pelvic adhesions The more serious clinical treatment of patients with a broader application and development prospects.