论文部分内容阅读
近代民主社会,立法和司法,均是一种民主程序。一切法律都由商谈产生。由于我国法律制度面临独特的现代化的任务,法律制定过程中缺乏商谈机制,过分倾向学者中心主义的问题已经显现。中国的司法过程中的一个核心难题就是,任何司法或者解释的过程必须在官方权威正当性、民间正当性和“现代化正当性”中寻求平衡。法律协商理论并非能够在三种正当性论证中做出选择,而是要求在司法过程中兼顾三种正当性。
Modern democratic society, legislation and judicature are all democratic procedures. All laws are negotiated. As China’s legal system is facing a unique task of modernization, there is a lack of negotiation mechanism in the process of law making. The issue of over-orientation to academic centrism has emerged. A core challenge in China’s judicial process is that any judicial or interpretive process must find a balance between the legitimacy of official authority, non-governmental legitimacy and “legitimacy of modernization.” The theory of legal consultation can not make a choice between the three legitimacy arguments, but instead requires that three kinds of legitimacy should be reconciled in the judicial process.