流传到现在的一些无款古代书画,有的在收藏家手中,有的在大小博物馆内珍藏。有的原无名款,误为大名家款。如北京故宫博物院藏的所谓曹知白《十八公图》,《石渠宝笈初编》著录,后有《十八公赋》已佚,据考证原为元人卢生所画,有人添加曹知白款,变成了曹画;北京故宫博物院藏元人《诸葛亮像》轴,原来根据图中有赵孟钤印,误定为赵孟画。实际上画法完全不类赵氏笔墨,可能曾经赵过目,加钤印章,便被后人误定为赵画;北京故宫博物院藏所谓赵孟《仙庄图》,《石渠宝笈·延春阁》著录,似盛懋一路画法,因盛的画法受过赵孟的影响,此画水平不低,故被作伪者添款冒充赵孟之作。据此,收藏界、书画界遇到类似问题不少。就 Some of the ancient paintings and calligraphy that have spread to the present, some in the hands of collectors, and some in the size of the museum collection. Some of the original nameless paragraph, mistaken for the big name models. For example, the so-called Cao Baibe’s “Eighteen Images” and the “Shibao Baodi Early Edition” hidden in the Palace Museum of Beijing have been recorded. After that, Turned into a Cao painting; Beijing Palace Museum Tibetan people “Zhuge as” axis, the original according to the figure Zhao Meng 钤 India, mistakenly identified as Zhao Meng painting. In fact, the painting is completely out of class with Zhao’s brushwork. It may have been used by Zhao and added with a seal. Later, he was later mistaken for Zhao. The Palace Museum in Beijing called Zhao Meng’s “Xian Zhuang Figure” "Cataloging, like Shengmao all the way to draw, due to Sheng’s painting by Zhao Meng’s influence, this painting is not low level, it was fake add money posing as Zhao Meng made. Accordingly, the collection industry, the painting industry encountered many similar problems. on