论文部分内容阅读
美国民事诉讼争点排除规则的存在免去了对存在于不同案件中的相同争点的反复判断,它所带来的不仅仅是诉讼成本的节约和诉讼过程的缩短,而且避免了对争点重复判断而可能产生于不同判决之间的不一致,以致矛盾状况的出现。这些使得司法系统得以有效率地运转,法律的稳定与权威也可以得到实现。但对效率的追求不应以牺牲公正为代价的,争点排除规则同时规定了诸多例外。通过这样的制度安排,对效率的追求与对公正的追求在相当大的范围上达成了一致。
The existence of exclusionary rules in the civil litigation in the United States eliminates the repeated judgments on the same issues existing in different cases. It not only brings about the saving of litigation costs and the shortening of litigation process, but also avoids repeated judgments on disputes May result from inconsistencies between different judgments, so that the emergence of contradictions. These make the judicial system operate efficiently and the stability and authority of the law can also be realized. However, the pursuit of efficiency should not be at the expense of justice, and the rule of exclusion of exclusion provides many exceptions at the same time. Through such institutional arrangements, the pursuit of efficiency and the pursuit of justice have been agreed on a considerable scale.