论文部分内容阅读
在二○一二年第四期《书法》杂志上载有向彬先生《谁给书法家验明正身》一文,作者认为是否为书法家应该有一个标准,但谁来制定这样一个标准成为最大的问题,故而提出了四种假设:一是让中国书法家协会来鉴别书法家身份,二是让书法市场来鉴别书法家身份,三是让学术界来鉴别书法家身份,四是让历史去鉴别书法家身份。在评论前三种假设的不足之后,把希望寄托在了历史的公正无私上,并认为“让历史去鉴别书法家身份是最佳选择”。
In the fourth issue of the “Calligraphy” magazine in 2012, Mr. Xiang Bin, who “identified the right body for calligraphers,” was included in the author’s opinion, whether the calligrapher should have a standard but who should come up with such a standard to become the largest Therefore, we put forward four hypotheses: one is to let the Chinese Calligraphers Association identify the calligrapher identity, the other is to let the calligraphy market to identify the identity of the calligrapher, the third is to let the academic community to identify the identity of the calligrapher, the fourth is to make history to identify Calligrapher status. After commenting on the shortcomings of the first three hypotheses, he placed his hope on the historical impartiality and selflessness and held that “letting history identify the identity of the calligrapher is the best choice.”