论文部分内容阅读
20多年前,对发生在匈牙利与斯洛伐克之间的多瑙河水坝案的判决,是国际法院针对国际河流利用过程中产生争端作出的第一份判决。这起案件是应用国际法、国际环境法的经典案例,对国际环境法的发展产生了深远的影响,并对国家环境责任的完善提出挑战。引发争执的多瑙河拦河坝1977年9月,捷克斯洛伐克和匈牙利两国高层决定,在多瑙河上共同修建并联合营运两座拦河坝,从作为界河的多瑙河中引水至捷克斯洛伐克领土内,以蓄峰模式运行一个双重拦河坝系统。规划的水坝系统包括一
More than 20 years ago, the verdict on the case of the Danube Dam between Hungary and Slovakia was the first Judgment issued by the International Court of Justice over the dispute over the utilization of international rivers. This case is a classic case of the application of international law and international environmental law, exerting far-reaching influence on the development of international environmental law and challenging the improvement of national environmental responsibility. Disruptive Danube Barrage In September 1977, the top leaders of Czechoslovakia and Hungary decided to jointly build and operate two barrages on the Danube River, diverting water from the Danube River as a border river into the territory of Czechoslovakia and operating in a peak mode Double Barrage System. The planned dam system includes one