论文部分内容阅读
审理微博名誉侵权案件的关键,不在于要不要在微博言论自由与名誉权之间进行平衡,而在于如何科学地进行这一平衡,从而获得一个相对客观正确的平衡结果。科学平衡的关键,在于找到一个客观外在的规范平衡结构。德国宪法学家罗伯特·阿列克西教授在发现这样一个结构方面进行了积极有益的探索,他所阐发的比例原则可以担当科学平衡这一功能。本文在阿列克西阐发的比例原则框架下,对“微博第一案”两审判决进行了合比例性分析,揭示出了比例原则对于进行相对客观正确的平衡的科学价值,以期为以后司法实务提供一种可资参考的操作方案。
The key to hearing the case of reputation infringement in Weibo is not whether to balance the freedom of speech and reputation of Weibo, but rather how to scientifically carry out this balance so as to obtain a relatively objective and correct balance result. The key to scientific balance lies in finding an objective and external normative equilibrium structure. The German constitutionalist Prof. Robert Alexei has conducted a positive and useful exploration in discovering such a structure. The principle of proportionality he has expounded can serve as a scientific balance. Based on the principle of proportionality developed by Alexey, this article makes a co-proportional analysis of the judgment of the second instance of “Weibo in the first case” and reveals the scientific value of the principle of proportionality for a relatively objective and correct balance, For the future judicial practice to provide a reference for the operation of the program.