论文部分内容阅读
“间接侵权”是我国学者继评析“Napster案”“Groskter案”之后高调引进并归纳出来的“创造性成果”。但英美判例形成的“辅助侵权”与“引诱侵权”并不能直接适用于我国网络著作权领域,相反能为我国已有的共同侵权制度所代替,因此,应适当解释帮助侵权、教唆侵权,以解决网络著作权侵权问题。
“Indirect infringement” is the “creative achievement” introduced and summed up by Chinese scholars following the analysis of “Napster case” and “Groskter case”. However, the “auxiliary infringement” and “luring infringement” formed by the Anglo-American legal precedents can not be directly applied to the field of online copyright in our country. On the contrary, they can be replaced by the existing common infringement system in our country. Therefore, we should properly explain how to help infringement and abetment Infringement, to solve the problem of copyright infringement on the Internet.