论文部分内容阅读
对于和有禄诉张杰侵权一案,概括起来说,我认为张杰《〈和式太极拳谱〉引起的风波》一文中的有些措词, 确实带有代表了一个群体思想上主观的鄙夷、抨击的含义。但根据有关法律解释,这些措词并没有损害到和有禄法律意义上的名誉权。将一般的名誉,完全当作了法律意义上的名誉,这是对法律意义“名誉”的误解。所以,这是一起不应该起诉的民事案。关于名誉权的法律解释中国社会科学院法学研究所法律辞典编委会主编、法律出版社于2004年1月出版的《法律辞典》447 页上是这样解释的: 名誉权:指自然人以及法人就自
As for the case of infringement against Zhang Youlu and Zhang Jie, in summary, I think some of the wording in Zhang Wen’s article “The Storm Caused by Taijiquan” did indeed represent a subjective ideological scandal and attack on a group The meaning of However, according to the relevant legal interpretation, these wordings do not undermine the legal right of reputation. The general reputation, completely as a legal reputation, which is the legal significance “reputation ” misunderstanding. So, this is a civil case that should not be prosecuted. On the legal interpretation of the right of reputation Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Law Law Dictionary editorial board editor, law press in January 2004 published “Dictionary of Law” on page 447 is explained: Honorary right: refers to natural persons and legal persons on the