论文部分内容阅读
窦娥的冤屈可谓今古共知。古往今来,有着千千万万的人为她的冤情唏嘘短叹。但法不容情,在法律面前没有证据的辩护总是显得苍白无力。一时间,法理与情理的冲突在人们面前激烈地展现出来。作为以德服人的友好国度和依法治国的严明国家,是体现人性还是遵守法律,是按照法理还是遵循情理,成为窦娥事件的焦点。本文通过对窦娥受冤的经历这一题材的分析,提出了法理与情理的冲突问题。并对此提出了一些自己的观点和议论。这是把文学作品中的人物进入现实生活中去分析评述的一个案例,对文学与法律的结合具有重要的意义。对研究情理与法理的矛盾有一定的参考价值。
Dou E’s injustice can be described as ancient and common knowledge. Throughout the ages, millions of people marveled at her grievances. But the law can not be tolerated, there is no evidence in the law before the defense is always pale and weak. For a time, the conflict between law and reason is intensely exposed in front of people. As a friendly country with morality and strict state governing the country according to law, it is the focus of Dou’e incident that it reflects humanity or abides by the law, follows the law or follows the reasoning. Through the analysis of the theme of Dou’e’s innocence experience, this article puts forward the conflict between law and reason. And put forward some opinions and discussions about it. This is a case of analyzing and commenting the characters in literary works into the real life and is of great significance to the combination of literature and law. There is a certain reference value to the contradiction between research reason and jurisprudence.