关于中国封建社会土地私有制的形成问题

来源 :历史教学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:spring19760128
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
几年来,全国史学界对于中国封建社会的土地所有制问题,作了广泛而深入的讨论,这将有助于对中国封建社会的一些重大问题进行科学而缜密的论述。就目前这一问题的讨论情况来看,究竟所有制的主要形式是地主所有制、还是国家所有制,言人人异,要想取得正确而一致的意见,显然尚有待于今后共同的努力。现在不揣浅陋,姑且提出我个人的一些看法,以就教于史学界和读者。一我是同意中国封建社会的土地所有制是以地主所有制为主要形式的。但我认为要阐明这一问题,除了注目于地租和课税的是否分离、土地的是否可以抵押买卖、土地所有 Over the past few years, the historians of the whole country have conducted extensive and in-depth discussions on land ownership in the feudal society in China, which will help to scientifically and elaborate on some major issues in the feudal society in China. Judging from the current discussion on this issue, whether the main form of ownership is landownership or state ownership and people’s opinions is different and that clearly obtaining the correct and unanimous opinions is obviously yet to be pursued jointly in the future. Now do not humble shallow, tentatively put forward some of my personal views in order to teach in history and readers. I agree that land ownership in China’s feudal society is dominated by landownership. However, I think it is necessary to clarify this issue. Apart from focusing on the separation of government rent and taxation, whether land can be bought and sold by mortgage or not, land ownership
其他文献
一  “一部二十四史,不知从何说起”是一句俗传之语,说的是中国各朝修撰的二十四部史书卷帙浩繁,事件人物众多,难以厘清说明白。其实,这源于南宋丞相文天祥在被俘后答复元朝丞相博罗劝降时的反问。据文天祥狱中所撰《纪年录》记述枢密院引问的情景,当时通事问他:“汝有何言?”文天祥答曰:“天下事有兴有废,自古帝王以及将相,灭亡诛戮,何代无之?”博罗抓住文氏所说“天下事有兴有废”,问道:“你道有兴有废,且道盘古