China’s Environmental Diplomacy

来源 :当代世界英文版 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:hahaha123789
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Global environmental governance was initiated at the 1972 UN Conference on the Environment. The 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development or Rio+20, the 2014 First UN Environment Assembly and the 2015 Climate Conference in Paris marked the transition of global environmental governance. China has always attached great importance to and actively participated in global environmental governance. In the context of the transformation of global environmental governance, China has become an important participant, contributor and leader in building global ecological civilization.
  The Evolution and Transformation of Global Environmental Governance
  A loose system on global environmental governance took form in early 1990s, which had the UN Environment Program at the core, other international environmental institutions as the supplement, and the UN Environment Assembly and the Conference among the Parties to the Convention as the ties. Global environmental governance aims to regulate and advance the global environmental protection through a variety of organizations, policy tools, financing mechanisms, rules, procedures and paradigms. Response to climate change, ozone layer pollution control and biodiversity protection are the most representative areas of global environmental governance.
  In terms of the structure, international organizations and institutions with the UN framework at the core are regarded as the “hardware system” of global environmental governance. As for the “software system”, various resolutions, declarations, conventions and international environmental laws provide a legal basis for global environmental governance. In particular, the environmental conventions and international environmental laws in the form of a multilateral environment agreements (MEAs) are legally binding. International conferences at various levels related to the theme of environment and sustainable development, including the world summit on the international political agenda, provide platforms for dialogue, debate, consultation and negotiation between the parties in concern. Global environmental governance mainly involves sovereign states, whose endeavor is supplemented by the participation of non-state actors. The sovereign states perform the function of handling environmental affairs through consultation and negotiation, and undertake the obligation of implementing MEAs and UN environmental and climate conventions.
  Marked by the 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development or Rio+20, the 2014 Reform of the UN Environment Assembly and the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015, the dominance of Western developed countries is giving way to the joint participation and leadership of both developed and developing countries in global environmental governance. The shift from national centralism to the joint construction and development of state, market and society, from the single issue of environmental protection to the high-quality sustainable development concept that takes into account environment, growth and equity, the theories and actors related to global environmental governance have also developed to varying degrees. With the current twists and turns in the process of globalization, the economic downturn and the COVID-19 pandemic have caused a certain impact on the global environmental governance, and the international community has been seeking to promote climate and environmental governance in the midst of global economic recovery.   First, the UN-centered global environmental governance mechanism keeps advancing. In June 2012 Rio+20 was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, At the meeting the document The Future We Want was adopted, which assessed the progress and outlook of global environmental governance, and endeavored to promote green economy, sustainable governance and institutional reform. The 2015 UN Sustainable Development Summit adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and the Paris Agreement was reached at the end of 2015. These global agreements have become important nodes in the reform of global environmental governance.
  Second, the entities of global environmental governance characterized by the North-South pattern show complex changes. Under the current global environmental governance system, the traditional divides between developing and developed countries, and between the south and north camps still exist in general, but in some specific situations, there are multipolar phenomena. Regarding different environmental problems, due to the different development modes and national conditions of each country, the countries have different starting points, attitudes and approaches to environmental problems.
  Third, local governments, social organizations and enterprises around the world are playing an increasingly important role in environmental governance. They formulate local environmental protection standards and cooperate with transnational local environment organizations to promote global green development; and raise the public’s awareness of environmental issues through extensive publicity and education. The transnational corporations or enterprises operating international businesses are bound to be influenced by international environmental policies, and they meanwhile serving as important carriers of international capital flow and technological diffusion are playing an increasingly important role in promoting global environmental governance.
  Concepts and Practice of China’s Environmental Diplomacy
  The transformation of global environmental governance faces the pressing need to overcome the dilemma of leadership deficit, public goods deficit and collective action logic. The US and Western countries are increasingly reluctant to provide public goods for global environmental governance, questioning the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and they reduce technological and financial support for developing countries in terms of environmental governance. In particular, repeated withdrawals of the US from the conventions and the rise of environmental populism in Western countries have led to stagnation in global environmental governance. In contrast, amid the transformation of global environmental governance, China has integrated ecological civilization into the grand blueprint of governance so that China has become a beautiful country with even bluer sky, lush mountains and limpid water. For one thing, China has made remarkable achievements in improving its domestic environmental governance; for another, China’s willingness and ability to fulfill its international environmental protection responsibilities have been greatly enhanced, and China has increasingly come to the center of the global environmental governance stage. The concept of ecological civilization put forward by China has received positive response from around the world, and remarkable progress has been made in pursuing the green “Belt and Road” Initiative.   Ever since the UN Conference on Human Environment held in the 1970s, China as a responsible major developing country, has been participating in, contributing to and leading the global ecological environment cooperation and governance. Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, China has proactively participated in and led a series of multilateral conferences, and negotiations on international conventions and international environmental legislation. China has joined a number of environmental governance mechanisms, conducted in-depth cooperation with environmental governance entities and played an increasingly important role. As a typical developing country, China continues to uphold and develop the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities to safeguard the interests of developing countries. By the end of 2020, China had carried out international cooperation and exchanges on the ecological environment with over 100  countries, and signed 150 documents on ecological environment protection cooperation with more than 60 countries, international and regional organizations. China has signed or signed to join 50-plus international conventions and protocols related to the ecological environment.
  At present, China conducts environmental diplomacy mainly through the following channels: First, it participates in the coordination of major countries in global environmental governance, advances multilateral international environmental negotiations on climate change, such as the Paris Agreement, supports the UN and G20 among other multilateral mechanisms in leading international cooperation on ecological environment protection; and pushes for making ecological civilization into the theme of the 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Second, it maintains close cooperation with relevant environmental agencies of the UN and the World Meteorological Organization; strengthens leadership over the participation of such international mechanisms as the Asia-Pacific Regional Forum of Environment Ministers, Asia-Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development, and ASEAN “10+3” Environmental Cooperation. Third, China proactively promotes South-South cooperation on climate change and provides assistance to other developing countries to the best of its ability through multilateral development banks among other mechanisms and such channels as the Climate Change South-South Cooperation Fund. Fourth, China pursues the green and low-carbon “Belt and Road” Initiative, and is committed to promoting cooperation in ecological environment and other aspects in the countries along the Belt and Road.   In the process of global environmental governance and negotiations, China has proactively participated in the formulation and implementation of international environmental laws. It contributed to the negotiation and institutional building related to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol in 1992. In 2015, the Paris Agreement opened a new era of bottom-up climate change governance.  China has made significant contributions by proposing the connotations of the “common but differentiated responsibilities” principle and the plan for “a nation’s independent contribution”; and has made the 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference a success through bilateral and multilateral negotiations between China and the US, between China and the EU, among G20, and among the “Basic Four” (India, Brazil, China and South Africa). At the opening ceremony of the 21st UN Climate Change Conference held in Paris in 2015, Chinese President Xi Jinping gave comprehensive and systematic introduction to the Chinese Concepts and the Chinese Plan for promoting global climate governance, announcing China’s goals and actions and major initiatives to promote South-South cooperation in response to climate change. At the 2019 UN Secretary-General’s Climate Action Summit, China’s proposal on “nature-based solutions” gained broad consensus among the participating countries, and urged countries around the world to attach importance to natural approaches, which in result integrated the “nature-based solutions” into the NDC of the Paris Agreement and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. China’s proposals and practices in addressing climate change, improving biodiversity protection and increasing marine reserves manifest the significant contributions of China’s environmental diplomacy to global environmental governance.
  In multilateral institutions, China has always paid close attention to environmental issues. Environment, energy and sustainable development are keywords of the G20 Summit. As a major member of G20, China has repeatedly stressed that all countries in the world should cooperate, uphold the vision of a community with a shared future for mankind, work together to address climate and environmental challenges and safeguard the blue planet. At all the BRICS Leaders’ Meetings since 2015, China has actively promoted the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and the respective capabilities of the signing parties. China has urged developed countries to provide developing countries with financial, technological and capacity-building support to enhance the capacity of developing countries to mitigate and adapt to climate change.   In major-country relations, China has always regarded environmental diplomacy as a priority. During the Obama administration, climate change was a high ground for China-US cooperation, cementing the foundation for a new type of major-country relationship between the two countries. China and the United States have held several summits and issued joint statements on climate change, demonstrating that China and the United States, as the world’s top two economies, energy consumers and carbon emitters, are working together to lead the pragmatic development of global climate governance. On April 22, 2021, President Xi Jinping attended the Leaders’ Climate Summit, proposed to build a community of life for man and nature, and welcomed the return of the US to the multilateral climate governance to jointly advance global environmental governance. In the meantime, the issue of climate and environment has been at the focus of the China-EU strategic partnership; both China and the EU adhere to the concept of green development and are committed to the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. In the wake of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Chinese and EU leaders demonstrated strong determination to jointly advance global environmental governance through the Joint Statement on Climate Change and Clean Energy, Joint Statement of Heads of State of China and France on Climate Change, and Beijing Call for China-France Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change.
  Cooperation with developing countries on climate change is an integral part of the Chinese government’s foreign assistance and South-South cooperation, and an important part of China’s international cooperation on climate change. China has made substantial efforts to help southern countries improve their ability to tackle climate change. In the new situation of facing increasingly prominent impacts of climate change, China as a responsible developing country, in the principle of doing its best within its ability, shares the achievements of green technological innovation and experience in green economic development with other developing countries, and supports them in strengthening their capacity building to cope with climate change. With ecological civilization and green development as the link, China has pragmatically promoted green development cooperation among countries along the Belt and Road, and enhanced China’s green influence upon the global development. The Green “Belt and Road” represents Chinese wisdom and a Chinese solution to improve the global governance system.   Advancing China’s Leadership in Global Environmental Cooperation in the New Era
  China is the largest developing country and a country with a large ecosystem. With the command of international environmental rules, the accumulation of experience in the practice of environmental diplomacy and the participation in international multilateral environmental mechanisms, China has become a great force on the stage of global environmental diplomacy. China’s environmental diplomacy strategy, based on the concept of “a community with a shared future for mankind” has basically taken shape, its diplomatic capacity is improving, and it is becoming mature in terms of diplomatic experience and wisdom. In 2017 President Xi Jinping delivered the speech titled “Work Together to Build a Communitiy of Shared Future for Mankind” at the UN Headquarters in Geneva, stressing that we should “make our world clean and beautiful by pursuing green and low-carbon development”.
  In that context of great global change, the camp of developing countries led by emerging powers is an important force on the world environmental diplomacy stage. “The Group of 77+China” is the main mode of cooperation among developing countries, and the green Belt and Road construction will help consolidate the solidarity and cooperation among developing countries in advancing environmental diplomacy. At the same time, China is proactively cooperating with developed countries in the ecological environment protection. By taking into account relevant strategic objectives of developed countries, China endeavors to enhance the initiative of environmental diplomacy with addressing climate change at the core. China and the United States have a lot of consensus on global climate change governance, green economic and technical cooperation, reform of the global environment governance system and exploration of joint response to extreme climate events. The EU’s foreign policy on environment highlights cooperation with developing countries in Africa, Latin America, the Mediterranean region and the Asia-Pacific region, and stresses climate change, the Green New Deal and the building of a zero-carbon society. The EU has common interests with China in helping developing countries formulate national development strategies, protect biodiversity, devise urban planning, and protect ecosystems. Both China and the EU adhere to the concept of green development, are committed to implementing the Paris Agreement on climate change, and endeavor to deepen cooperation by taking the opportunities of hosting international conferences on biodiversity, climate change, and nature conservation.   China should make best use of its environmental foreign policy to promote international cooperation. First, it should give full play to its role of the rotating presidency and prepare for the UN Convention on Biological Diversity Summit (COP15), to promote cooperation in coordinated governance of “climate – epidemic – biodiversity” within the framework of the UN. Second, it is to improve the environmental diplomacy agenda at the 15th Convention on Biological Diversity Summit in Kunming. Third, in the face of the global trend of “carbon-neutral” and zero-carbon race and the fact that environmental technological cooperation has become a ballast for environmental diplomacy, China can work with relevant countries to strengthen cooperation regarding zero-carbon economy, environmental technologies, river basin water pollution prevention and control, hazardous waste disposal, chemicals management, strategic environmental impact assessment, and environmental accident warning and emergency response. Fourth, it is to strengthen unity and cooperation among developing countries and jointly defend the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”.
  Conclusion
  With the emergence of deep-seated contradictions between man and nature, and the increasing disagreements between countries, especially between developed and developing countries, global environmental governance faces unprecedented difficulties. In this context, President Xi Jinping’s “Persistence in Six Aspects” proposition on harmonious coexistence between man and nature and systematic governance hold great significance to the era, providing a direction for leading the reform of the global environmental governance system.
  The current environmental challenges facing mankind are systematic interrelated challenges concerning climate, health, energy, food and water, which result from the systematic destruction of the earth’s environment. As the reform of the global governance system interweaves with economic recovery, China has put carbon peak and carbon neutral in the overall layout of ecological civilization construction. China’s environmental foreign policy and practice show that China readily undertakes the international responsibility for environmental governance, and environmental governance is not necessarily at the expense of development. As the largest developing country and a responsible major country, China helps other countries solve environmental and development problems with its own capital, technology and experience as well as the pursuit of a green “Belt and Road”, with a view of enhancing its say in global environmental governance and jointly promoting the building of global ecological civilization. President Xi Jinping pointed out, “Sustainable development is a golden key to solving global problems. It holds a similar goal and shares a similar philosophy with the building of a community with a shared future for mankind”. Global environmental cooperation needs to constantly highlight the pattern and background of harmonious coexistence between man and nature, and through adopting people-oriented green development and systematic governance, China will continue to provide the “China Plan” in global green recovery, and vigorously promote the building of a community of life for man and nature under the frameworks of the UN, major-country cooperation and multilateralism.
  Yu Hongyuan is Director of the Institute for Comparative Politics and Public Policy, Shanghai Institute for International Studies
其他文献
单相并网逆变器在实际应用中,为了防止桥臂上下两个开关管同时导通,会在调制过程中加入死区时间。死区效应会导致逆变器向电网注入谐波,使电网电流的质量下降。为了抑制死区谐波,通常采用基于控制器的谐波补偿方法,包括基于谐振控制和基于重复控制两种。通过分析重复控制器的结构和性能,提出了一种新的重复控制器参数设计方法,与传统的参数设计方法相比,这种方法的系统稳定性更好,且稳态误差几乎为零。最后通过MATLAB仿真实验证明了此方法可行。
新中国成立以来,我国少数民族面貌、民族地区面貌、民族关系面貌、中华民族面貌都发生了历史性巨变,这些是伴随着社会主义制度的建立与完善实现的。中华民族多元一体的国情,决定了我国的治国理政必须正确应对和处理民族问题。本专题围绕民族问题概念进行建导,包括其社会历史背景、外延内涵的演变、生成与转换规律、判断和建导的拿捏等,旨在明确百年巨变之下的中华民族历史使命。
文章对混凝土构件早期自收缩试验方法和混凝土在约束状态下早龄期应力变化的研究方法进行分析。早期自收缩试验方法分析结果表明:混凝土构件可以忽略早期收缩静摩擦力产生的应变值,但混凝土3d龄期的干燥收缩不容忽略,且LVDT测量法优于千分表测量方法。混凝土在约束状态下早龄期应力变化研究方法分析表明:环形约束试验法操作简单不易偏心,但不适用于钢筋混凝土试件;直线约束试验法应采用电液伺服系统控制试件长度并进行修正,并可分析徐变量和约束间关系。由此可知,素混凝土的早龄期阶段收缩试验方法受限,仅限于环形约束条件。钢筋混凝土
孕期是女性人生的一个特殊阶段,会面临许多关系到自身母体与胎儿健康的新问题。如果女性及其家庭缺乏相关的知识,那么就会很容易在孕期前后陷入手足无措的境地。王方凌编著的《孕妇护理与禁忌》一书属于“家庭医疗保健系列”的专著。该书主要围绕孕妇的护理展开,不仅对孕妇的日常生活、饮食、运动等进行了指导,还对女性妊娠中常见的症状、疾病进行了护理与治疗方面的意见与建议。从整体来看,该书实用性强,专业全面,能够给有孕妇的家庭许多卓有价值的启发与指导。
以往研究发现中国人对中国社会变迁的知觉存在“美好明天效应”,人们认为随着中国社会变迁,中国人的能力和热情水平均会提高,从而区别于一般的认为能力提高、热情降低的社会变迁知觉的民间理论。本研究采用问卷法对1281名中国民众进行调查,探讨中国人的文化认同和文化自信对“美好明天效应”的影响机制。结果发现文化认同显著正向预测对未来社会能力和热情的变迁知觉(“美好明天效应”),文化自信在其中起完全中介作用。这一发现对理解中国人在中国社会变迁背景下的文化认同与文化自信具有一定的启发意义。
天然橡胶是一种用途广泛的战略物资,由于受自然条件和种植面积等因素所限,我国天然橡胶的产能还不能满足实际生产需求,每年都得大量进口。分析了“十三五”期间我国天然橡胶的进口情况。
新课程标准提出,在开展相关教学活动的过程中,除去要给学生传授课程知识和技能以外,还要加大学生的德育教育,让学生不仅具备丰富的理论知识,还要让他们有足够的思想认识和道德素养,进而实现学生综合素质的全面提升。基于此,文章就素质教育背景下初中德育教育中存在的问题展开讨论,提出了增强德育教育实效性的策略,以供参考。
长春市是北方唯一一个多民族聚居地城市,是我国重要的工业基地,有着丰富的工业建筑,由于所处区域及历史原因,致使分散的锅炉房非常多。本文以锅炉房更新改造为主要研究对象展开论述,从可持续发展战略角度出发,以多视角探究锅炉房建筑特征。通过调研和对长春市锅炉房现状的分析,发掘目前既有锅炉房在实际改造中存在的问题,提出锅炉房更新改造的若干问题,以期对未来锅炉房改造项目起到引导和推进作用。
模拟缺氧/好氧(A/O)模式运行的序批式活性污泥法(SBR)处理系统,探究利用羟胺实现城市污水短程硝化的投加点优化.批次实验发现,溶解氧存在会降低羟胺对亚硝酸盐氧化菌(NOB)抑制效果的(20±0.5)%.此外,相较于未经缺氧处理和延长缺氧时间(>15min)处理,缺氧时间为1~5min可提高NOB活性抑制率13%~25%.长期试验表明,在缺氧段末投加羟胺的短程硝化系统维持NO2--N积累率92%以上,而在好氧阶段投加羟胺的系统NO2
作为学生生长发育最重要的阶段,小学教育的重要性是毋庸置疑的。本文针对阳光体育理念,对现阶段的小学体育学习方式的变革与创新做了具体的探索和思考,希望能够对未来小学体育的发展有所贡献。