什么是阿瑟·丹托的艺术终结论——对沈语冰的回应

来源 :美术馆 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:hx8842898
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
沈语冰在《艺术没有终结——对阿瑟·丹托艺术终结论的反驳》一文中对阿瑟丹托的后现代理论进行批判,我将其概括为:第一,沈语冰认为丹托在终结了瓦萨里和格林伯格宏大叙事之后,却无法回避自己代言的后历史时期宏大叙事。第二,沈语冰将丹托纳入福柯,贝尔庭、黑格尔的系统内,通过对此三者的多重批判,从而在源头上否定丹托艺术终结论的合法 Shen Yu-bing criticizes Arthur Dantou’s postmodern theory in his article “There Is no End of Art - A Refutation of the Art Termination of Arthur Danto.” I summed it up as follows: First, Shen Yunbing thought Danto was over Vasari and Greenberg grand narrative, but can not evade their own endorsement of the grand narrative of the post-historical period. Second, Shen Yu Bing put Dantone into the system of Foucault, Bell Chamber and Hegel through multiple critiques of the three, thus denying the legal validity of the final conclusion of Danto at the source
其他文献