论文部分内容阅读
看了《戏剧报》第一期上舒湮同志《尊重历史与符合逻辑》一文,我有不同看法。舒湮同志认为《大明魂》“硬把祖冲之拖入张氏的所谓‘剖尸辨症’一案,风马牛不相及,毫无根据”。原因是“祖冲之在华林苑当差”,“不可能结识一个平民百姓唐赐”,“孝武帝时也未授与巡行四方的大权”。很明显,舒湮同志是从历史的根据和虚构的可能性两方面否定剧本的这一基本构思的。史实上确无祖冲之与唐赐夫妇有任何瓜葛的记载,但作为文艺作品的
Having read the commentary of Comrade Shu Shu annihilation on “respecting history and logic” in the first issue of The Drama Newspaper, I have different opinions. Shu annihilation comrades that “the great soul” “hard Zhuzu dragged into the so-called Zhang’s” autopsy disease case, irrevereable, there is no basis. “ The reason was ”Zu Chong’s Waring in Waring Court,“ ”It is impossible to get to know a common people Don,“ and ”the power of the four parties was not granted to patrol during the filial piety." Obviously Shu comrades denied the basic idea of the script from both the historical basis and the possibility of fiction. In fact, there is no ancestor rhyme with Tang and his wife have any association records, but as a literary and art work