论文部分内容阅读
一“刺激性”一词大家是非常熟悉的,它深深地进入我们的生活,成为一个普遍的评判标准:我们认为有些事物是具有刺激性的,而有些则是平和的、和谐的、淡远的。但刺激性包含的丰富美学意蕴,以及尤其在当今的视觉文化覆盖之下的人类社会中,刺激性具有的潜在重要地位,则很少有人仔细研究。“刺激性”一词在英文中的表达是pungency,具有辛辣、尖刻、敏锐、剧痛的含义,此处所表达的是刺激性的生物基础。刺激性首先来自人的某种自然感受,其次才被引申到广泛的文化评价领域。刺激性究竟具有什么样的生成机制,它有着什么样的魅力,发挥着何等的作用,正是本文试图解决的问题。它潜藏在人们的潜意识中,人们依赖自然的感受迎合它的效果,但是背后的运行机制往往被忽略。
The term “irritant” is very familiar to everyone. It goes deeply into our lives and becomes a universal standard of judgment: we think something is stimulating, while others are peaceful, harmonious, light Far. However, the rich aesthetic implications of excitability, and the potentially significant position of excitability in human society, especially in today’s visual-cultural context, are seldom studied carefully. The word “irritant” is pungency in English. It has the meaning of spicy, sharp, sharp and sharp. What is expressed herein is an irritating biological basis. Incentives come first of all from one’s natural feelings, and secondly to the broader field of cultural evaluation. What stimulus has its own production mechanism, it has what kind of charm, what role to play, it is the problem this paper is trying to solve. It lurk in people’s subconscious, people rely on natural feelings to cater to its effect, but the operating mechanism behind is often neglected.